The Day of Reckoning, Accreditation: The day we wish would never come

Comments

2 comments posted
I just wanted to add a note

I just wanted to add a note about the greater responsibility that BJU has as a Christian college to not only be honest about their accreditation status, but also to be specific about what that means to its students. The ITT Tech advertisement was very interesting because it sounds to me like they are simply attempting to protect themselves legally since at least one lawsuit has been filed against them because of credits that wouldn't transfer. But of course, one would hope that a Christian school would have more noble intentions other than concerns of being sued. In any case, Pensacola Christian College requires students to sign a form.

It says:

"PCC has never made application for regional accreditation because it could jeopardize the College’s philosophical distinctives.  It is the practice of PCC, and other colleges and universities, to accept or reject credits based on their own institutional criteria regardless of whether or not credits will be accepted by another college of the student’s choice.  While PCC makes no representation that its graduates will be accepted by specific institutions, boards, professional bodies, or government agencies, it is the intent of the administration and faculty to meet and exceed standards of quality in academics, which are posed by recognized accrediting associations"

PCC belongs neither to a national or regional accrediting organization. In my opinion, however, even this disclosure statement is somewhat misleading (It's funny how it sounds like, "Oh, you were rejected from graduate school because PCC isn't accredited? That's normal because PCC's grad school rejects graduates of other schools all the time!"). But at least the basic info is there, and PCC would probably be protected if a lawsuit was filed against them. 

Actually, I'm sort of impressed that PCC admits that basically it's anybody's guess if any grad school would give you a second look, or if you could ever practice as a health care worker, take the CPA exam or bar exam, ever work for the government on any level, or in any modern occupation except perhaps the most basic of entry level positions. (Of course, after the student signs this form, I wonder how many times in four years PCC's version of the one guy who got into Yale is mentioned.)

But who has time to worry about "boards" and "professional organizations" when PCC has an indoor bowling alley, a 265 acre waterfront park, a swim center, and a new indoor water park with synthetic surfing waves? On the other hand, if you look at both PCC and BJU as little more that a place to hear some solid preaching that will prepare your personal character for life, or a place to find a Christian spouse, meet some great Christian friends, sharpen your athletic skills, and academically practice for that second bachelor's degree you'll need to complete later, then consider that one year's tuition and room and board at PCC is only $7,500 and the cost at BJU is $17,220. (Back to the questions of "is it worth it?" If Mormon young people can devote two years to learning about their church and ministering before heading to college, than perhaps fundamentalist young people can devote four years!)

But seriously, I guess that it says a lot about my experiences that I'm sort of impressed with PCC's odd disclosure statement. It says a lot about how BJU is not only not being "up front" about what they are really offering, but how they are systematically misleading students about what type of occupations and opportunities  are available to individuals who earn a degree from BJU.

Tyler Williamson

 

Posted by Anonymous on Mon, 01/24/2011 - 12:34
Updated Link, Still Misleading

Hey Tyler, your link didn't work, it got truncated in the middle, but Google saved the day. Here is the link to the document which he was referring to.

While I do think it is odd to even have this level of disclosure from PCC or BJU the statement really isn't that helpful. I got a similar line from the Provost at BJU. Basically the idea is that each individual institution can accept or reject credits/degrees for any reason at all. Which is true, but what they are trying to say is this, "if we had accreditation you could still be rejected from transferring classes." True, if I took classes at a regionally accredited school there is no guarantee that another school will accept those credits, but that doesn't mean that regional accreditation doesn't go a LONG way to helping those credits move along, and that non-regional or no accreditation is no worse. The truth is that most institutions will do their best to accept at least some credits earned at a regionally accredited school, if not all. Sure that means that some may n ot transfer, but the accepting institution will at least consider the thought. However, with no accreditation or non-regional accreditation the accepting institution has no obligation to even attempt to accept your credits and often has a hard rule in place not to accept those credits.

By pretending that this is a problem that even Harvard transfer students have to go through is exteremely misleading itself. There are still transfer credit woes, but nothing in the ball park of whole sale denial with no recourse options available. With regional accreditation at least you can make your case to the provost.

Posted by bjuaccreditation on Mon, 01/24/2011 - 17:57